Recent news is showing that the affordable care act is expanding access towards abortion. For a long time now, Obamacare supporters fight to stay that the bill essentially has nothing to do with abortion at all. Obama also promised that there would be no health care funding towards abortion at all. This past week, pro abortion protested flooded the supreme court in a well organized fashion, asking for a pro choice right.
Since allies, and anti choice groups have decided to mandate a debate, pro choice people find it appropriate to embrace Obamacare's expansion of more funded contraception and the abortion industry.Could this potentially change a certain relationship between the Federal Government and the individual? Fundamentally, yes. Should there be support and subsidization? I say yes, it would be ideal. Is it realistc? No, the country does not have enough coverage to support every single person. Should it be taken to such extremes and will a line eventually be crossed and intentions misconstrued? Possibly.
People who can not contain obtain health care due to preexisting conditions are not even considered in this pool. Then there is who to really believe in this situation, or course government officials are going to lie, and activist organizations who may be a tad too bias, it all comes down to an insurance plan, that will protect all circumstances where the life of a woman would be at risk. Then of course, there is the whole argument surrounding whether the abortion is considered necessary or not to be covered through insurance? This is of no authority of a single human being to make a decision for the sake of the life of another. People are throwing around abortion like its no big deal, and have completely lost the meaning behind the beauty of being a mother, however, if the women feels it a responsible choice, and insurance will cover it, so be it. But to place discrepancy between whats a necessary abortion and whats not is completely unjust.
No comments:
Post a Comment